The New Loki Series Has An Excellent And Unexpected Hero Car

Image for article titled The New Loki Series Has An Excellent And Unexpected Hero Car

Screenshot: Disney+

Like many of you, I’ve been watching that new Loki series and have been very impressed with the whole mid-century/Eero Saarinen/Terry Gilliam’s Brazil sort of look to the show. The series has been pretty thin on cars, but that changed with this most recent episode, which featured some really excellent and I think inspired car-casting.

Advertisement

I don’t want to give away any crucial plot points, but I think I can say that the episode takes place in a sort of temporal junkyard, where discarded bits from many timelines end up, and, it seems, fall into considerable disrepair.

Most of the cars that are first seen in this episode are like that, weed-choked, rusty hulks, but at least a few are identifiable:

Image for article titled The New Loki Series Has An Excellent And Unexpected Hero Car

Screenshot: Disney+

Well, maybe just that Beetle on the top left is actually identifiable, though the car below it looks a bit like an early 70s GM, maybe a Caddy or Oldsmobile?

But there is one car that actually gets driven and a good amount of screen time. This one:

Image for article titled The New Loki Series Has An Excellent And Unexpected Hero Car

Screenshot: Disney+

This is the one I want to talk about, because it’s a delightfully obscure choice. That car, which appears to have been once employed by a place called Skinny’s Pizza, complete with a spring-mounted rooftop pizza slice, is a Datsun Bluebird Wagon.

Image for article titled The New Loki Series Has An Excellent And Unexpected Hero Car

Screenshot: Nissan

Advertisement

Now, I’m not exactly certain what year Bluebird it is the wagon came out in 1963, and by 1965 it got the 1300 engine, with a ravenous 62 horsepower. In the show, that little wagon is cooking along nicely over the rough, ruined terrain, so maybe let’s say it has the benefit of those extra 100cc and is a 65.

I don’t think it’s a 66 to’67, because it looked like the taillight design changed in 66 to this:

Image for article titled The New Loki Series Has An Excellent And Unexpected Hero Car

Screenshot: Nissan

Advertisement

…and the one in the show appears to have the earlier taillight design, pre-reverse lamps and with a larger round section on the inside:

Image for article titled The New Loki Series Has An Excellent And Unexpected Hero Car

Screenshot: Disney+/Nissan

Advertisement

There also seems to be an Easter Egg here, too: the license plate reads GRN-W1D, which I bet it a reference to Mark Gruenwald, a writer and editor for Marvel who wrote a number of Avengers comics.

(I don’t actually know much about comics, if I’m honest, so that was a combination of a guess and Google; perhaps someone who knows more may be able to confirm my guess.)

Advertisement

So, I think we’re seeing a 1965 Datsun Bluebird 1300 Wagon here, and I want to praise the car-casters for the show for picking something charming interesting and decidedly unexpected.

These early Datsuns were good little cars, well-built and useful, and I think are a pretty reasonable choice for darting around a confusing wasteland. They were pretty good on fuel economy, too, which I bet is important since it’s not clear where the gas is coming from in this peculiar place.

Advertisement

I’m pretty sure this is likely the only time a Datsun Bluebird will be a featured car on a major series all year, so, you know, drink it in, everybody.

Got a traffic ticket? If you’re looking to mask your ticket through a DMV licensed online driving school in CA check out Fast Course 4 Less. They have a money back and low price guarantee with courses available 24/7 starting at $19.95!

The Tesla Model S Plaid Won’t Actually Go 200 MPH

Illustration for article titled The Tesla Model S Plaid Won't Actually Go 200 MPH
Image: Tesla

Tesla is having a hell of a time with the whole car business this week. First Elon announced that the Plaid + model was cancelled because the standard Plaid was too good. Then earlier on Thursday Tesla announced it was raising the price of the standard Plaid, set to launch Thursday night, by $10,000. And now the company has been forced to walk back performance claims of the new high-speed Model S. Apparently that 200 mile per hour claim is only true if your car is equipped with optional wheels that don’t yet exist.

Advertisement

Tesla has recently added a note to its configurator page informing potential customers that “The indicated Plaid top speed requires proper wheels and tires which will be available in Fall 2021.” Allegedly, at least according to a display at tonight’s Plaid Event, the new facelifted Model S is now capable of a drag coefficient of 0.208, which beats the already impressive Mercedes EQS and Lucid Air by 0.001 and 0.002 Cd respectively. That will certainly help the car to achieve a high top speed, but apparently without the right wheels and tires, it’s still out of reach.

When the Plaid was announced last year, Daddy Elon promised it would run 0-60 in under 2 seconds, run the quarter mile in “sub-9 seconds”, go 200 miles per hour, and run on the company’s new more-efficient 4860 battery cells. As we get closer to the Plaid actually delivering, it’s failing ever more of those claims. Not only have the 4860 cells been dropped, but it’s only been able to run a 9.2-second quarter (which is truly bonkers, but not a sub-9). Range has been reduced, the price has been increased, and now the top speed has been pushed back. Just once it would be awesome if Tesla under-promised and over-delivered.

Hitting 200 miles per hour is not an easy thing to do, and it’s pretty much useless on any street car, but the fact that it’s now within reach for a relatively mainstream car is quite an accomplishment. I’m sure that several people will order this 200+ MPH wheel and tire package just for bragging rights, but how many will actually take their Tesla to 200? A dozen? Fewer? It’s a little funny that the fancy new Tesla continues the trend of Tesla failing to deliver on its claims, but if/when this wheel package is released to the public, it’ll make the Model S faster than pretty much anything in that price range. Will that be the electric car’s 959/F40 moment?

I’m guessing that this top speed has less to do with the wheels, but more the tire on which the car rides. Getting an extremely heavy machine like the Model S (already nearly 5,000 pounds in dual-motor guise) to go 200 miles per hour is going to put a lot of stress on those Michelins. Maybe this is a brand new tire that the French tire maker had to develop specifically for the Plaid. I guess I’d rather Tesla err on the side of safety and caution for once than allow people to go two bills in their car without the proper tire for it.

In any case, the tri-motor superfast Tesla is officially launching on Thursday night at 11PM Eastern, and the Tesla website still promises deliveries beginning in June. There are twenty days left in the month to make that true. We’ll see.

The company has been taking deposits for the Plaid since last September. I wonder if anyone who placed a deposit on their Plaid will be backing out of the deal. Either way, it’s a great way for Tesla to get interest free $1,000 loans from hundreds of customers. Man, what a great idea for some free capital injection for your car company!

The Volkswagen Touareg V10 TDI Could Turn A Superhero Into A Villain

Illustration for article titled The Volkswagen Touareg V10 TDI Could Turn A Superhero Into A Villain
Photo: Mercedes Streeter

I just flew out to Seattle to buy a 2006 Volkswagen Touareg V10 TDI, a vehicle so infamously expensive to repair that any one visit to the dealership could cost as much as a whole new car. Not only did the Touareg make it the 2,100 miles home, but it did it without even triggering a check engine light. And, I should mention, the engine under the hood of this SUV has the power to corrupt even the best drivers.

Advertisement

Like many car enthusiasts, I spent my formative years watching car-focused television and videos. One of the videos that’s still vivid in my memory is watching a blue Volkswagen Touareg V10 TDI pull a decommissioned Boeing 747 down a runway at a leisurely pace. That story is incredible in itself, as VW added 15,498 pounds of ballast weight to the already nearly 6,000 pound SUV before hitching it up to the 747.

Since I recently got news that my Passat W8 has met an unfortunate end, I decided to replace it with something even more stupid. I took the gamble and picked up the V10 TDI sight unseen with the only promise being that it didn’t have a check engine light. And what I found out in my 2,100-mile drive home is that the marketing for the V10 TDI isn’t just hype. This thing is as ridiculous in real life as it appeared to be in promotional videos.

Illustration for article titled The Volkswagen Touareg V10 TDI Could Turn A Superhero Into A Villain
Photo: Mercedes Streeter

New, they were expensive. The starting price for the V10 in 2006 was $67,750, or $91,240 in today’s money.

On the outside and even the inside, the Touareg V10 TDI isn’t much different than its VR6 or V8 siblings. We’ve written about the mind-boggling first-generation Volkswagen Touareg and the technology VW put into it before. You can get the same stuff without opting for V10 power. Here’s the V10 TDI compared to the VR6:

Illustration for article titled The Volkswagen Touareg V10 TDI Could Turn A Superhero Into A Villain
Photo: Mercedes Streeter

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled The Volkswagen Touareg V10 TDI Could Turn A Superhero Into A Villain
Photo: Mercedes Streeter

Illustration for article titled The Volkswagen Touareg V10 TDI Could Turn A Superhero Into A Villain
Photo: Mercedes Streeter

Advertisement

Your first sign that something is different about this Touareg is the V10 TDI badge on the back.

Illustration for article titled The Volkswagen Touareg V10 TDI Could Turn A Superhero Into A Villain
Photo: Mercedes Streeter

Advertisement

Things change once you hop behind the wheel and fire up that V10. American diesels back in 2006 still sounded a bit like a big rig, but this? It’s quiet. It even idles smooth like a well-tuned V6 or V8. But open up the throttle and the engine will take you on an adventure.

The Touareg V10 TDI weighs about 6,000 pounds. It even looks heavy. So when you put the throttle down you don’t expect it to launch like a sports car. But stomp it and you’ll hear those twin turbos spool up followed by a surge of power that keeps you in your seat.

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled The Volkswagen Touareg V10 TDI Could Turn A Superhero Into A Villain
Photo: Mercedes Streeter

The power in itself is bewildering because it’ll keep you in your seat through every gear and past every speed limit in the land. You’ll run out of road before the V10 runs out of power.

Advertisement

It’s weird, too, because on paper, the V10 TDI isn’t all that impressive. It makes 310-HP and 553 lb-ft torque. Those are similar numbers to the Ford 6.0-liter Power Stroke V8 of the same year, and those don’t make you feel like you can pull down a mountain or tow a jumbo jet. And, the V10 TDI is able to dispatch 0-60 times in about 7 seconds in the real world.

Where the V10 TDI really shines is on the highway. See a mountain up ahead? The V10 TDI will climb it without breaking a sweat or downshifting. Need to make a pass? It’ll pass anything in your way faster than you can say Ferdinand Piëch.

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled The Volkswagen Touareg V10 TDI Could Turn A Superhero Into A Villain
Photo: Mercedes Streeter

On my trip home I scored 20 mpg while scooting through the Rockies and it wasn’t like I was trying to be conservative with the go pedal, either.

Advertisement

There have to be some downsides, right? Of course there are!

You have to remove the engine to do what would be minor repairs on smaller engines. Alternator? Engine removal. Turbos? Engine removal. Starter? Engine removal, or disassemble much of the right side of the car. As you can imagine, that makes anything related to the engine a hilariously expensive repair.

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled The Volkswagen Touareg V10 TDI Could Turn A Superhero Into A Villain
Photo: Mercedes Streeter

Still, despite the endless warnings from former owners and even our own articles, I couldn’t resist the temptation.

Advertisement

I’m glad, because I’ve never driven an SUV this fun. The V10 TDI is irresponsibly fast and the intoxication of driving it is so corrupting that it could turn Superman into Lex Luthor. It’s a vehicle that somehow doesn’t run out of power; at least, so long as it’s working right. The accelerator pedal is like a gateway drug and somehow, it’s packaged up in a SUV body that can tow around 8,000 pounds and off-road like a beast.

Illustration for article titled The Volkswagen Touareg V10 TDI Could Turn A Superhero Into A Villain
Photo: Mercedes Streeter

Advertisement

I paid $5,000 for this one and as far as I can tell, it only needs a new dial for the air suspension, a little touch up paint on the tailgate and new tires. Otherwise, everything works as it should. But even after my trip would I recommend you buy one? Absolutely not, unless you have like 10 other cars to drive when it breaks.

Battery Swap Stations Are Gaining Momentum In China

Illustration for article titled Battery Swap Stations Are Gaining Momentum In China
Screenshot: Nio

The simplest and most genius-brain solution to charging times and range with EVs isn’t one you’ll find in America. In China, though, it’s gaining ground. All that and more in The Morning Shift for June 2, 2021.

Advertisement

1st Gear: China Is An Alternate Universe For EVs

China is like the American car market in so many ways. It’s huge, for one, (the biggest in the world while we’re number two) and filled with people inexplicably buying sedans and not hatchbacks or wagons. It’s also the biggest market for electric cars in the world, and you see as many Teslas bopping around Shanghai as you do here in New York or Los Angeles.

But China also offers us a market where GM builds small, adorable, unbelievably popular EVs as opposed to 9,000-pound hulking Hummers for the rich. It feels like an alternate reality where everyone takes EVs as a given, not as a radical tech.

This is a long intro to the point that battery-swapping stations are taking off there, as noted in this overview story by Automotive News China:

Until 2019, state-owned BAIC Motor Co. and EV startup Nio were the only two automakers offering battery swap services for customers.

[…]

Competition from Tesla and Nio’s success in gaining customers with battery swap services have prompted other Chinese EV makers to take bold steps.

[…]

While Geely is constructing battery swap stations on its own, other Chinese automakers have opted to build facilities along with domestic companies to share costs.

In September, state-owned Changan Automobile Co. launched its first battery swap station in Chongqing along with a consortium of other major domestic companies.

The partner companies include CATL, China’s largest EV battery maker; Aulton New Energy Vehicle Technology Co., a Shanghai-based battery swap station operator; and State Grid, a state-owned power grid operator.

In March, SAIC Motor Corp., another major state-owned automaker, also teamed up with Aulton to kick off operation of the first battery swap station for its EVs.

Aiways, an EV startup, tapped Blue Part Smart Energy, an EV charging facility operator under BAIC, in April to offer battery swap services.

This is all interesting to see from an American perspective, especially one based out of New York City. Around the turn of the century, NYC was home to the largest electric car company in the world, the Electric Vehicle Company, and it operated using battery-swapping stations right in the middle of Manhattan. The tech is basic. We could go down this route if we wanted to.

2nd Gear: Another Tesla Recall

Some 6,000 Tesla Model 3 and Model Ys are getting recalled for loose brake caliper bolts, as Reuters reports:

Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) is recalling nearly 6,000 U.S. vehicles because brake caliper bolts could be loose, with the potential to cause a loss of tire pressure, documents made public on Wednesday show.

The recall covers certain 2019-2021 Model 3 vehicles and 2020-2021 Model Y vehicles. Tesla’s filing with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said it had no reports of crashes or injuries related to the issue and that the company will inspect and tighten, or replace, the caliper bolts as necessary.

Tesla said that loose caliper bolts could allow the brake caliper to separate and contact the wheel rim, which could cause a loss of tire pressure in “very rare circumstances.” The company said that, in the “unlikely event” there is vehicle damage from a loose or missing fastener, it will arrange for a tow to the nearest service center for repair.

Advertisement

Hey, at least they got the bolts on there this time!

3rd Gear: Everyone Is Copying How Elon Talks

Another interesting Tesla story comes from Bloomberg, which has taken notice that everyone is not just copying Tesla’s plans to make attractive and desirable electric cars, but also how Tesla talks them up with ever-grander terminology. Per Bloomberg:

Many of the words speak to the sheer scale of Musk’s ambitions, which are always far grander than people realize initially. A battery factory isn’t just a battery factory, it’s a Gigafactory. (Giga comes from the Greek word “gigas,” or giant.)

A fast charging station for Tesla’s electric cars isn’t just a charging station, it’s a Supercharger. (Tesla has more than 25,000, giving them the largest network in the world.)

The battery packs that Tesla sells to utilities that promise “massive energy storage?” Megapacks.

There are no signs of him stopping. At Tesla’s “Battery Day” in September 2020, Musk talked about reaching “Terawatt-hour” scale battery production. “Tera is the new Giga,” Musk said on stage.

We’ve now reached the point where every battery factory — even those being made by competitors — is called a gigafactory, regardless of its physical size or planned output. “Nissan in advanced talks to build battery gigafactory in UK,” reported the Financial Times. “Stellantis discussing conditions with Rome to build gigafactory in Italy,” said Reuters.

Advertisement

Would Tesla be where it is if everyone just called gigafactories what they are? (They’re just regular factories.)

4th Gear: Toyota Scaling Back Olympic Plans

The Olympics in Japan seem to be still on somebody’s schedule, even if the people of Japan seem less than stoked on a global travel-fest in the midst of a still-ongoing global pandemic. Of course, this has huge implications for … high-profile industrial manufacturing that hopes to use the Olympics as a sales and marketing opportunity! Reuters has a broad report on it, and I’ll just take out this little section on Toyota:

For global sponsor Toyota Motor Corp., the Games were a chance to showcase its latest technology. It had planned to roll out about 3,700 vehicles, including 500 Mirai hydrogen fuel-cell sedans, to shuttle athletes and VIPs among venues.

It also planned to use self-driving pods to carry athletes around the Olympic village.

Such vehicles will still be used, but on a much smaller scale — a “far cry from what we had hoped and envisioned,” a Toyota source said. A full-scale Olympics, the source said, would have been a “grand moment for electric cars.”

A Toyota spokeswoman declined to comment on whether there were any changes to its marketing.

Advertisement

5th Gear: Biden Blocks Trump Plan For Arctic Drilling In Alaska

This is not a total win for climate, but it’s something, as the Financial Times reports:

The Biden administration has announced it will suspend the Arctic oil drilling rights sold in the last days of Donald Trump’s presidency, reversing a signature policy of the previous White House and handing a victory to environmentalists.

[…]

Tuesday’s decision marked a victory for environmentalists and activists, a pillar of Biden’s support in last year’s election, who have begun to grow impatient with some of the White House’s climate actions. The administration recently opted not to intervene to force the closure of the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline and has supported a major Alaska oil project approved during Trump’s term in office.

“In general the Biden administration is acting vigorously on climate change,” said Michael Gerrard, founder of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University. “This action on ANWR is quite consistent with that. The actions on the other two projects do not seem so consistent.” 

Advertisement

I’ll take anything I can get at this point!

Advertisement

Neutral: How Is Your Car?

My Bug refused to start the other day just as I had loaded the car up for a multi-day road trip. With rain coming down, it refused to start even when I flagged down a ‘90s Infiniti for a jump. I ran out and got a new battery and it did start, but was running like shit until I found a half-bare wire leading to the coil. Some electrical tape later and we were on the road, though I’m still finding the car getting hot and leaking oil around some seals I know I just replaced. Stopping after one mountain pass I saw vapor rising out of one of the two carburetors. Time for a tune-up!

Tyler Reddick On The Potential Of NASCAR’s Next-Gen Racers

Illustration for article titled Tyler Reddick On The Potential Of NASCAR's Next-Gen Racers

Photo: Chris Graythen (Getty Images)

Tyler Reddick’s first full-time NASCAR season was a strange one: the COVID-19 pandemic swept through the world, depriving him of the opportunity to really familiarize himself with his car. And despite the lack of practice and qualifying, he finished 19th overall in the championship, nabbing three top-fives along the way. And he’s also one of the few drivers who has had the chance to test NASCAR’s Next-Gen car.

Advertisement

We had a chance to talk with Reddick about his impressions of the Next-Gen car earlier this week. 

This interview has been lightly edited for clarity.

Elizabeth Blackstock: I didn’t feel like I could write a full picture of the car until I’d talked to someone who’d actually driven it. Would you mind starting with some of your biggest takeaways and impressions of the car from your test at Darlington?

Tyler Reddick: I’d heard stories and feedback from other drivers like Kurt Busch, Cole Custer, my teammate Austin Dillon. But when you go to Darlington, I’d say for 50 years, it’s been one of the toughest race tracks on our schedule, so I really wanted to have some insight before I did that test based on how challenging the car was to adapt to. I heard all these comments that say it’s hard to drive, it’s hard to feel, it’s this, it’s that.

When I strapped into the car for the first time and made my first laps in it, I didn’t really have anything I didn’t like about it right away. The biggest thing about it, I’d say, is that this car has a lot more mechanical grip, and it’s taken away a lot of the side force that really stabilizes these heavy 3400-lb cars on corner entry. That being taken away really makes mechanical grip into the corner—and how drivers turn into and lift in the corner—much more sensitive. It’s much more important to keep the car under control.

With what we have now, you can just drive it up into the corner as hard as you want. Normally, the first thing that gives way is the front end, the tires. And how this Next-Gen car is, it’s totally possible to drive into the corner too deep, lift too quick, give it too much brake and too much steering input, and you’re going to back it straight into the fence. It’s going to, from my experience at Darlington, challenge the drivers from our generation.

It was just a very exciting test. The car is symmetrical, you have to drive the daylights out of it, and it’s not stuck to the ground 15-20 laps on tires at Darlington. When I experienced that, it was a lot of joy, but I was working my tail off to keep it on the trace track and keep it pointed straight and keep it out of the fence.

Advertisement

EB: How do you think you’re going to have to change your driving style in order to accommodate this kind of car?

TR: I think my driving style will fit pretty well at tracks like Darlington, the abrasive, bigger race tracks—the mile-and-a-halfs, the one-point-threes. If we go to bigger tracks with this downforce and horsepower package, I think it could be a really good fit. I didn’t get to drive or personally experience what this car is like to drive with less horsepower and more downforce, but from what I saw in my test, I feel like less downforce would be good for this car, and keeping the horsepower in the 650 area is a good deal. Because they are challenging to drive, for sure, as the grip wears away. And I feel like they should be.

Advertisement

With what we have now, yes, it’s challenging. We’re fighting the race car. But we’re never really at risk of taking a slide that ends your day and backs you into the wall. You mostly take a slide that costs you a lot of momentum. You still have to drive the cars really hard like you had to this last Sunday at Kansas. Everyone was driving the cars hard up on the fence, bouncing off of it, but like, your penalty for making a mistake isn’t as huge. With the Next-Gen car, you have to respect that if you overdrive it, you can crash it pretty easily. You have to respect the car, and I find that a very nice, rewarding, refreshing challenge that hopefully we’ll have at a lot of these other big tracks.

EB: I’ve heard a lot of similar feedback that it has a lot of potential and that you do have to respect it. Specifically, what is it that you have to do in order to respect this car, to drive it within its limits but at its limit?

Advertisement

TR: You can go over the limit for sure, but the two big things that have been talked about pretty broadly are the amount of side force that really isn’t in the Next-Gen’s body, what with it being symmetrical. It really takes away a lot of the side force that’s been holding the car to the ground so well. The side skirts go all the way to the ground and seal off any air from being able to pass underneath the car, to the shape of the right rear quarter panel. All those things really hold the car to the ground. Now we’ve opened it up. We’ve got that underbody belly pan that’s carbon fiber, so you can’t bottom it out or you’ll break it. There’s wear blocks to keep it from bottoming out, so there’s air passing underneath the cars. The quarter panels are much shorter and not as long or as close to the ground.

What probably got me at first when I was driving the car and having to manage it through the corners and keep it straight during the test, it’s easy to forget that you’re on a much smaller of a sidewall with the Goodyear tire on the 18-inch wheel. You’ve got a wider tire, a wider surface area that has a lot more grip, especially when you take off on new tires. But especially at a place like Darlington, you really notice that when the tire grip goes away, that thinner sidewall, you can’t resaturate the tire as much. When you do step over that limit, the penalty you pay is twice as big and happens twice as quick because you don’t have as much flex within the sidewall of the tire. You just have to understand that and shift your mental limit of how much you can lean on the tire and the car in the corner. In this car, if you even barely go over the limit, it’s going to have a bigger moment because it makes more grip when it has grip. When you lose it, you lose it in a big way, especially with the side force not being there.I

Advertisement

It’s definitely a big challenge, but I love it. It made driving around Darlington an absolute blast all by myself. I know that everybody watching could see the car wiggling around as I was going through the corners, where you don’t see that quite as much right now. With this Next-Gen car, I can’t wait. I hope we see a full field of them with the power we have right now and the downforce on them, the lower downforce package. You’re going to see guys from literally lap one to lap 40 or 50 into a run having to wage war not only with the other competitors on the race track but with their car to try to make it drive better. It’s very exciting.

EB: How do you think it’s going to respond when it’s in traffic?

TR: That’s the thing—and that’s why I think less downforce is probably a good thing. In my opinion, I’ve always been the guy that likes more power and less downforce, but as I mentioned how much you have to respect the car because you can’t overstep the limit and have the side force of the car straighten you out when you make a mistake, I could see the concerns of the other guys who have driven this car with the higher downforce package on the mile-and-a-half tracks where you have all this grip but when you overstep the limit, you’re going to have a harder time catching it when you’re in dirty air if your car relies on all that downforce to make grip. Traffic will be very interesting, but as crazy as it sounds, the more downforce these cars have, the worse they are in traffic. We’ve been able to make this high-downforce package work at a lot of race tracks because we’re running so close to wide open that the draft you have on the straightaways can wash out the deficit you have in the corners. But truly, the less downforce the cars make, the less they need to go around the race track. I think the drivers will have a better time racing side-by-side and doing battle if the car relies on less downforce when we race it.

Advertisement

EB: You had a little bump-and-grind with the wall. How did the car respond to that because that is, like, a thing that happens during races?

TR: Normally if you spin, it’s not going to be a good thing. It sounds repetitive but it comes down to the side force. Never, in the races I’ve run at Darlington, have I spun going into Turn One. I’ve gotten loose, but normally I can catch it. Normally you’re tight going into Turn One. But again, this car, if you lift too hard or try to do too much on corner entry, you’re not just going to get tight or a little bit loose. You’re going to spin it out.

Advertisement

And that’s what happened. I was trying to push the issue, try to find some more speed in Turn One by driving in deeper and using more steering and brake inputs to turn the car. I just over-rotated it. Without the side force being there to hold it in place, the thing just completely came around. It came around so fast that it caught me off-guard. Normally if you spin out like that, the side force built into the cars really guides it up the track and all the way down to the apron. It’s a real slow spin. Where with this Next-Gen car, it spun around and was almost facing completely backwards before I could even blink. So I did like a 360 up by the wall, but as the smoke was clearing out of the cockpit, I thought I was down by the apron, but I was still right up by the wall where I had spun. So the front of the car was still coming back around, and the right front corner kind of clunked the wall as it finished doing the 360.

At that point, I’d blown all the tires out, so I rolled it down to Turn Two and just parked it there, and the guys brought tires out, and we took it back to the garage and loaded it up. It was the last run of the day, so we were pretty much done anyway.

Advertisement

Crashes are going to look a lot different. When people spin, they’re not going to spin down the race track. They’re going to spin and be right in the racing groove. It’ll be another thing the drivers will have to learn the hard way. The way you save a car in a spin will be a lot different.

EB: What kind of safety technologies are coming along with that since the car is spinning and staying in that racing groove?

Advertisement

TR: A lot of times when drivers spin in Trucks or Xfinity or ARCA, they either overcorrect or they back into the wall completely. Cars spinning out and backing into the fence isn’t anything new. It happens. But this car, from my understanding, is structurally very sound. They did a lot of work making the chassis really safe. The crashes we saw at Kansas with Bret Holmes’ center section caving in, this car’s a lot more resilient to those kinds of impacts.

I don’t know a lot about it other than that, just from sitting in it and driving it, realizing the front clip is literally bolted to the center section, and the back clip is bolted to the center section. I’ve never really tested anything like that, and I didn’t hit the wall hard enough to do any bad damage. All we damaged was the splitter, which was allegedly being replaced for the test at Texas. So, I didn’t really damage that much. We just had to repaint the right front portion of the fender. But the car looks really safe. It definitely feels a lot different on the inside. The bars and everything inside the car appear to be a little bit different to what we had. But that makes sense when you crawl up and look under the car, or in the front fender well and look at the suspension, or crawl into the rear fender wells and look at the independent rear suspension, it’s like, “wow.” It’s totally different. And it does drive a little different on the track, too.

Advertisement

EB: So, your first full-time NASCAR season kind of threw you into the deep end because you got, like, no practice or qualifying before races. And I know there have been other drivers who have tested this car, but do you think that even the little bit of testing you’ve had, the ability to push it past the limit and spin, to see what it’s like—do you think that’s going to help you next year?

TR: Yes, absolutely. Obviously you don’t want to crash NASCAR’s Next-Gen prototype, right? I got in this thing, and I want to find those limits. I don’t want to crash it. And I went over the limits thousands of times in this test, but I did it in places that I could keep from damaging the race car. Unfortunately the last lap that I ran of the day was the one where I spun and caught the wall a little bit.

Advertisement

I mean, us as drivers, we’re going to overdrive these race cars, so I think it’s important that we overstep the limits in controlled settings. This Darlington test was the perfect place to do that with the different tire falloff we’re going to have and the different tire combinations we went through at that tire test. It’s important to push and understand where your limits are as a driver right now with this car and what you can do to better prepare and improve. What can I improve to be readier for this car when it rolls out? I mean, it’s going to be fun. A fun learning experience for all of us, but especially for those that haven’t gotten to test it yet.

EB: If you could just pick one thing, what’s your favorite thing about this car so far?

Advertisement

TR: Well, it’s with Darlington in particular. With the cars we have right now, we can run below the transition and banking into Turn One and kind of run down below the white dotted line on a section of track that has less banking. Darlington kind of widened out because we have so much more downforce on our cars in recent years. My favorite part about this car is that it has all this mechanical grip, but that doesn’t mean you can run the apron going into Turn One and run that narrower line. If you touch it, or touch too much of it, even on new tires, it can crash you. So what was just so exciting was that I’m at Darlington doing this tire test, and it feels like old-school Darlington in the sense where you have to respect Turn One. I feel like we could see guys, where if they get a door on them, the guy on the inside is going to have to decide, if the outside guy doesn’t let me go, I’m going to crash trying to pass him on the inside. I feel like it could return to that old, narrow, challenging race track that it was years and years ago. It still is challenging, but I just feel like it’s narrowing back up, and it’s going to make it more challenging for drivers when we race there. And that’s what we need. This car needs to challenge us, and Darlington is the perfect track to lay that out for the Next-Gen car and for us whenever we get there.

For GREAT deals on a new or used Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep or RAM check out Patterson Tyler Group TODAY!

What Do You Want To Know About The 2021 Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat Redeye Widebody?

Illustration for article titled What Do You Want To Know About The 2021 Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat Redeye Widebody?
Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

It has a mouthful of a name, but you may never drive a car as muscular as it is desperately fun. It’s the 2021 Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat Redeye Widebody, baby!

Advertisement

I’m in the middle of a full week with this magical machine, and even though the weather hasn’t been ideal for my first outing in a rear wheel drive performance car that boasts almost 800 horsepower, I’ve been having one hell of a time. Not only is the most satisfying gas-guzzler I’ve ever driven, but everyone in my entire family has been fielding questions about it wherever we go. I dropped my younger sister off at her math class, and all the preteens were ogling at the window. I dropped my mom off at the Nissan dealership to pick up her Armada, and she had to let people know that, no, this isn’t actually her daughter’s car. My neighbors hear the doors unlock and wait outside to ask if that’s what they think it is. My grandpa won’t stop asking for photos. My brother asked if he can have the engine to put in his Scamp. I think this is the first time my mom has been legitimately impressed by the fact that I write about cars, whereas most of the time she’s just glad I’ve found something to do that makes me happy.

undefined
Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

It’s definitely a vehicle that demands attention, which has taken more adjustment from me than dealing with mad wheel spin on damp roads (although I’ve quite enjoyed scaring the shit out of my sister with that whole situation). No one has ever paid attention to my Mazda 2 aside from once when it was parked at COTA and someone drew a penis on the window in dust.

And I figured that, if I’m going to be writing about this fella, I should know what you want to know before I take this sweet fella out for a long weekend drive.

The Audi A6 E-Tron Concept Is A Long-Range EV With A Confusing Name

undefined
Image: Audi

Audi’s electric range is finally taking shape, now that the E-Tron GT and Q4 E-Tron have joined the existing E-Tron crossover. And in case you thought the E-Tron branding couldn’t possibly get more puzzling, Audi just revealed a concept of the A6 E-Tron it expects to hit showrooms sometime in the next two years.

Advertisement

It’s bothering my obsessive-compulsive tendencies that E-Tron now exists as a standalone nameplate and a version of existing Audi models, but I’ll try my best to keep that down to focus on the concept itself, which looks pretty good. The A6 E-Tron debuted at the Shanghai Auto Show today, and marks the first Audi we’ve seen based on the company’s Premium Platform Electric architecture.

Audi calls the A6 E-Tron a sportback, which followers of the brand may argue actually make it more of an A7 by nature. According to Audi, the A6 name was chosen to link this car to one of the brand’s most historically significant models, and dimensionally it’s equivalent to the existing A6. Here I am again talking about the car’s name — you just can’t get away from it with these new electric Audis.

undefined
Image: Audi

The design you see here is reportedly 95 percent representative of the final model, which isn’t bad news considering that the A6 E-Tron cleans up for the most part. Sure, it’s derivative in places — the high beltline of the profile evokes the departed Ford Fusion in my mind’s eye, and the way the headlights meet the grille — I’m sorry, the inverted face, as Audi calls it — strikes me as remarkably similar to the Mustang Mach-E’s furrowed brow. Neither of these familiarities are necessarily bad though. Don’t hold your breath for images of the interior yet — Audi is saving those for later.

undefined
Image: Audi

Audi designers say the tautness of the roofline and width of the track on this concept will be scaled back slightly ahead of production, though the black trim near the floor that looks like a cutaway panel will be retained. It’s a neat visual trick that slims the car down somewhat, and I like the way it trails toward the rear bumper. There are projectors at the corners that beam light at the ground to greet passengers and signal turns that may or may not make it to the final iteration. There’s a precedent for similar tech in road cars already, though, so it wouldn’t be inconceivable if it did come to pass.

Advertisement

In terms of performance figures, Audi is mostly keeping those close to the chest for now. This concept packs a pair of electric motors combining for 469 horsepower and 590 lb-ft of torque. That’s projected to get the A6 E-Tron to 62 mph from a standstill in under four seconds.

Illustration for article titled The Audi A6 E-Tron Concept Is A Long-Range EV With A Confusing Name
Image: Audi

Advertisement

Turning to range, Audi claims the A6 E-Tron will return more than 700 km on a full charge (434 miles), though under the generous WLTP cycle. The E-Tron GT is rated for 298 miles by that same measure, so the A6 E-Tron is sure to bring a huge range improvement to the brand even if the actual, real-world distance falls short of the WLTP-based projection. For reference, the latest Tesla Model S starts at an EPA-estimated 412 miles of range.

The A6 E-Tron’s efficiency is helped by an ultralow drag coefficient of 0.22 — one of the lowest out there, matching Mercedes-Benz’s A-Class — though there’s no confirmation on whether those slight exterior changes to the production car will dent that somewhat. Like other new electric Audis, it supports 800-volt peak charging that aims to replenish 300 km of range in just 10 minutes.

Advertisement

As far as timing of the sedan’s arrival, for now Audi is saying only that its first PPE-based cars will emerge in the second half of next year. That will likely begin with the Q6 E-Tron, before this A6. In the meantime, I’m going to try and work out a flowchart to make sense of all these E-Trons.

At $13,500, Could This 2013 Dodge Caravan Camper Unleash Your Inner Nomad?

Nice Price Or No DiceIs this used car a good deal? You decide!

Wanderlust may not be a clinically defined ailment, but if it were, today’s Nice Price or No Dice Dodge minivan might just prove an effective therapeutic. That is, of course, only if its price makes it an affordable prescription.

Advertisement

Based on the comments for last Friday’s 2003 Porsche 911 Carrera cabriolet, the ugly specter of Porsche’s infamous intermediate shaft bearing failures continues to plague the cars of the early 21st century. (I required an updated IMS as a condition of purchase when buying a 986 Boxster for myself.) The absence of a confirmation that the IMS bearing, clutch or rear main seal had been replaced on Friday’s 110,000-mile 996 model caused many of you to pause. Even more of you noted that it could make for a bargaining point over the car’s $21,500 asking price. Still, the voting didn’t reflect that line of thinking, as it came in at a conclusive 57 percent Nice Price win.

The synopsis for the Oscar-nominated film, Nomadland, is incredibly simple: Frances McDormand plays a widow who traverses the American Southwest in her camper-converted van while occasionally working at an Amazon distribution center. Obviously, there’s more to the film than that simple description, but that gets you the basics without requiring a “spoilers ahead” warning at the outset.

I found Nomadland to be engaging and, as you might expect given the subject matter, heartbreaking at times. One takeaway that escaped me after watching the film, however, was any sense that I wanted to experience the van-living lifestyle firsthand. If the movie had moved me to such lengths, I’d say that today’s 2013 Dodge Caravan camper conversion could conceivably be a means to that end that I might just consider.

At the heart of this 195,000-mile mini motor home is a fifth-generation Dodge Caravan. This model is the last of the line — so far at least — for a Dodge-branded people carrier. Power comes from a transversely mounted Pentastar 3.6-liter DOHC V6 engine. That makes a healthy 283 horsepower and 260 lb-ft of torque, making this one of the more powerful minivans you could buy. Bolted to the engine and sending all those horses to the front wheels is a six-speed 62TE automatic with Dodge’s funky dash-mounted shift lever. The ad says that the van has seen regular maintenance at a Dodge dealer and is in “great condition all the way around.” An accident-free history is another plus.

Advertisement

The entire camper conversion appears to have been added to the van with limited encroachment on the passenger space. Those passengers better travel light, however, since the luggage space in the back and any thought of loading stuff on the roof has been eliminated by the addition of, respectively, a full kitchenette and roof-top bunk. With the pop-top and the center seats folded out, this van could conceivably sleep four.

Advertisement

The whole camper conversion is claimed to have been professionally installed, and it does look to provide most of the comforts of home save for a private place to do your business. But hey, that’s what Starbucks are for, right?

Advertisement

Both the exterior and interior look to be in terrific shape, save for an odd crease on the bottom of the curb-side sliding door. The only complaint that could possibly be leveled at the interior surrounds the fixed center console between the front seats. That impedes pass-through to the back. That’s Dodge’s fault, not that of the camper conversion, and is a frustration on all up-spec’d Caravans, converted or not.

Advertisement

This camper comes with a clean title and the assertion by the seller that it will get around any sort of RV parking restrictions your city or HOA might impose. The question, of course, is what could all of this possibly be worth? The seller asks $13,500 for the van, and it’s now time for you to weigh in on how good a deal that may be.

Advertisement

What do you think, is $13,500 a fair price to join the camper crowd? Or, does that price have you thinking you’d rather just stay home?

You decide!

Advertisement

San Francisco Bay Area, California, Craigslist, or go here if the ad disappears.

Help me out with NPOND. Hit me up at rob@jalopnik.com and send me a fixed-price tip. Remember to include your Kinja handle.

The Huayra R Is A Sign Pagani’s Almost Ready To Move On

Illustration for article titled The Huayra R Is A Sign Pagani's Almost Ready To Move On

Image: Pagani

I feel almost nothing looking at these pictures of the new Pagani Huayra R, the latest, most hardcore and supposedly one of the last versions of the Huayra that the Italian boutique supercar maker will build.

Advertisement

Like other Huayras, this one has a 6.0-liter V12 from AMG. However, this particular iteration is naturally aspirated and develops 850 horsepower. The Huayra R weighs just 2,314 pounds and generates way more downforce than any previous Pagani. It costs 2.6 million euros before tax — nearly $3.1 million — and just 30 will be built. I’m sure their owners will love ’em.

In fairness to the Huayra R, my disinterest has nothing to do with the car itself. Track-focused hypercars that can’t legally run in any category of motorsport have never made a ton of sense to me, though they’re a cool show of unbridled performance, and the Huayra R earns points for its commitment to the naturally aspirated V12 and stylish exterior. I mean, you could put a picture of this and the Zonda R next to each other and depending on how recently I woke up or how much I’ve had to drink, I probably wouldn’t be able to tell them apart — but that’s another story.

undefined

Image: Pagani

Rather, my feelings are an inevitable consequence of Pagani’s glacial release cycle. It makes a car, and then it sells special editions of that car for 10 years, and then it makes another one. It’s only done this twice, but because that’s transpired over the course of two decades, I often find myself wondering whether Pagani is still a thing or not.

And look, Pagani doesn’t have to change its process for anybody. There’s something refreshing about the one car approach in this age of excess, and the understanding that once said car reaches its final form, like the Huayra R, it’s time to move on. So while I’m finding it hard to care about the Huayra R itself, I also sort of do because of what it represents. It’s a sign that the next Pagani is coming. As we’ve established, that’s a rare event in the course of world history.

undefined

Image: Pagani

Advertisement

What will the Huayra successor be, then? It’s codenamed C10, and it’s been a while since we’ve heard anything about it. Back in 2019, founder Horacio Pagani told Road & Track that both twin-turbo V12 and battery-electric versions would be sold, with the V12 optionally paired with either a manual or a paddle-shift transmission. At the time, Pagani said the car would arrive in 2021. You can imagine there’s at least a small chance that schedule might’ve slid in the past year.

Until that day comes, we have the Huayra R — a pretty neat track machine in its own right, but also a symbol that Pagani is right on the brink of another transformation.

Williams Debuts The Best Wheels Of This Year’s F1 Grid

The livery that the Williams FW43B will wear this year leaked ahead of time through a VR app which featured 3D renderings of the cars in the F1 series. The leaks showed off the final look and I did a double take when I saw its glorious wheels.

Some app users took screenshots of the machine and it was posted on Reddit ahead of the official unveil from Williams. But leaks aside, the livery looks great! I think it’s my favorite of this year’s grid because Williams is nodding to some iconic cars with its color palette and because I can’t get enough of its five-spokes.

Advertisement

The wheels are not exactly like those from the iconic FW14B, which Williams says they drew inspiration from for this machine, but the construction is similar and it’s objectively true that five-spoke wheels are the best wheels. Lose yourself in this static image of the wheel and imagine the vortex from those five-spokes in motion:

Again, it’s still an updated wheel design, which you can see in the hollow spokes but it’s still got a retro vibe that I’m digging hard.

Advertisement

And the rest of the F1 car follows that updated heritage theme from the wheels up. The Williams team elaborated on the inspiration in a statement to the FIA where it shouted out its old F1 cars:

Whilst evolutionary on the technical side due to the regulations, hence the designation FW43B as opposed to the FW44, the 2021 car will race with a dramatic new visual identity sporting a livery inspired by Williams’ all-conquering cars of the 1980s and 1990s, combining blues, white and yellow accents.

Advertisement

Those color accents are most prominent on this new F1 car’s nose but it also has a multilayered finish on its engine cover vaguely similar to the layering from the older cars. Though, the new one has a cool perspective effect going on. When you look at the Williams F1 car’s profile the engine cover seems to have a rectilinear fading finish in some pretty rad blue hues.

Advertisement

But when you look at the F1 car head-on, or from an elevated viewpoint, the fading lines follow the contours of its body and seem wavy!

Advertisement

Advertisement

I think the FW43B does the best job this year at producing a cohesive design from both the actual body and the livery its wearing. It goes to show how much you can get out of taking both of these into account for the final product.

Advertisement

This awesome machine “will be raced […] this season by British driver George Russell and Canadian Nicholas Latifi,” according to the statement from the FIA and even if the Williams drivers can’t outpace the big spenders on the grid, they’re going to look damn fine trying.

For GREAT deals on a new or used Chevrolet check out Tom Bell Chevrolet TODAY!